How Credit Unions and Regional Lenders Can Win in Home Equity Lending in 2026

By /

How Regional Lenders Can Win the Refinance Market in 2026

The refinance market in 2026 is expected to be steady but uneven, with short rate-driven windows that favor lenders who are ready to move quickly. Regional lenders can succeed in this market by focusing on efficient workflows, strong borrower relationships, and predictable closing timelines. This blog explains what the 2026 refinance market looks like for regional lenders, how borrower expectations differ in refinance transactions, and how streamlined title and closing processes, supported by CSS, help lenders capture refinance opportunities without adding staff or complexity.

Home equity lending heads into 2026 with real momentum. After a strong rebound in 2025, demand isn’t disappearing; it’s settling into a more durable, sustainable pace. Homeowners still have record levels of equity, many are holding onto low first-mortgage rates, and second-lien products continue to make sense for borrowers who want flexibility without refinancing their primary loan.

What’s different this time is how success is defined. Winning in home equity isn’t about lender type or balance-sheet size. It comes down to execution: how efficiently teams can move, how clearly processes are defined, and how ready operations are when borrowers decide to act.

For credit unions and regional or community lenders alike, home equity rewards those who can deliver a clean, consistent experience without friction, moving confidently from application to closing when the opportunity shows up.

For regional lenders, that reality changes the playbook. Competing in this environment isn’t about matching national banks on volume or marketing reach. It’s about having a refinance strategy built for speed, consistency, and borrower confidence when the moment arrives.

In the refinance market of 2026, the lenders who will succeed will be the ones with efficient workflows, trusted borrower relationships, and the ability to execute when rates shift. That’s where regional lenders tend to shine, if their operations are ready for it.

What Does the Home Equity Market
Look Like in 2026?

The home equity market heading into 2026 is best described as steady, intentional, and selective. Demand remains strong, but it’s no longer driven by urgency or speculation. Borrowers are making measured decisions based on real needs, and lenders are operating in a market that rewards preparedness more than prediction.

Several forces continue to support home equity demand:

  • Record homeowner equity gives borrowers options, even as affordability remains a concern elsewhere.
  • Reluctance to refinance first mortgages keeps second-lien products attractive for homeowners who don’t want to give up favorable rates.
  • Practical use cases like home improvement, debt consolidation, and liquidity planning continue to drive applications.

Growth expectations for 2026 reflect a healthier balance. After the surge in 2025, volume is expected to moderate but remain positive. This is a more controlled market, with fewer spikes driven by speculation and more activity tied to borrower intent and timing.

The product mix also remains consistent:

  • HELOCs continue to dominate, offering flexibility in an environment where borrowers want access without committing to a full draw.
  • Fixed-rate home equity loans still matter for borrowers who prefer predictable payments for specific, one-time needs.

A few takeaways lenders should keep in mind:

  • Demand is real, but it’s not automatic.
  • Borrowers are intentional and sensitive to timing, rates, and ease of execution.
  • Volume tends to arrive unevenly, in bursts rather than steady waves.

In this environment, success depends less on guessing where the market goes next and more on being operationally ready when borrowers decide it’s time.

Why Are Borrowers Turning to Home Equity Instead of Refinancing?

For many borrowers, home equity has become the more comfortable option compared to a traditional refinance. With so many homeowners holding historically low first-mortgage rates, giving that up feels like a step backward, even when rates soften. Second-lien products let borrowers access cash while keeping their existing loan in place.

Home equity also feels more flexible and lower risk from a borrower’s perspective. Instead of resetting their entire mortgage, they can borrow only what they need and tailor the structure to their situation. Common use cases continue to include:

  • Debt consolidation, especially to replace high-interest credit card or personal loan balances
  • Home improvement projects that add long-term value without increasing first-lien payments
  • Liquidity needs that don’t justify a full refinance or long-term restructuring

The borrower profile supports this shift. Most home equity borrowers are not under financial stress. They tend to have:

  • Strong credit profiles, often well above prime thresholds
  • Conservative combined loan-to-value ratios, leaving significant equity untouched
  • A strategic mindset, using equity as a financial tool rather than a last resort

The key expectation underlying all of this is simplicity. Borrowers generally believe a home equity loan or line should be easier than their original mortgage. When the process feels slow, complex, or unpredictable, it quickly clashes with that assumption and can stall otherwise solid demand.

What Operational Pressures Does Home Equity Create for Lenders?

While demand for home equity remains steady, many lenders are feeling pressure on the operational and cost side. Home equity is often viewed as simpler than a first mortgage, but in practice, it introduces its own set of challenges that affect both efficiency and margin.

One important difference: in many home equity programs, lenders absorb more of the origination costs. Title and valuation expenses that would typically be borrower-paid in a purchase or refinance are often covered by the institution in a second-lien transaction. That makes home equity more cost-sensitive by design and leaves less room for operational inefficiency.

Common pressures show up in a few familiar ways:

  • Longer-than-expected cycle times, even for lower-risk loans
  • Drop-off between application and funding when timelines stretch
  • Manual steps that quietly add days and internal cost to each file
  • Fragmented vendor coordination across valuation, title, and closing
  • Thinner margins that make product and vendor selection more consequential

On a day-to-day level, that friction often looks like:

  • Re-keying the same borrower or property data in multiple systems
  • Managing several vendors who each handle a piece of the file
  • Different processes depending on product type or geography
  • Limited staff capacity when volume arrives in short bursts

These pressures aren’t unique to any one type of institution. Lean teams feel them most acutely, whether they’re part of a credit union or a regional bank. And because home equity margins are often tighter than refinance or purchase transactions, inefficiency carries a direct financial impact.

In a market where borrowers are timing-sensitive and lenders are cost-sensitive, operational clarity matters. The programs that manage both turn time and product selection deliberately are the ones that protect margin while still delivering a consistent borrower experience.

What Does “Execution” Actually Mean in Home Equity Lending?

Once you account for thinner margins and lender-paid costs, execution in home equity becomes very practical. It’s about making deliberate decisions that control spend, protect turn times, and reduce operational drag.

In today’s environment, strong execution usually starts with three areas of focus:

Optimizing Title and Valuation Product Selection

Not every loan requires the most comprehensive product. In fact, using full title insurance or a full appraisal on every file can unnecessarily increase cost and slow timelines.

Execution means matching the product to the loan:

  • Lower-dollar, lower-risk loans may be well suited for AVMs/PCRs and property reports
  • Mid-range loans may benefit from hybrid valuations that balance cost and confidence
  • Higher-dollar or more complex loans may warrant full title insurance or a full appraisal

When product selection is intentional rather than automatic, lenders reduce overall spend and shorten cycle times without introducing unnecessary risk. Over time, that discipline meaningfully improves margin.

Consolidating Vendors

Vendor sprawl adds complexity. When valuation, title, and closing are handled by separate providers, internal staff often end up coordinating between them, comparing product options, and resolving inconsistencies.

Consolidating with a provider that offers a full spectrum of valuation options, a full range of title solutions, and coordinated closing support reduces that burden. It shifts product comparison and coordination away from underwriting staff and into a more streamlined, centralized process. Fewer handoffs typically mean fewer delays and clearer accountability.

Designing Processes That Can Scale

Execution also means building workflows that don’t break when volume increases. When product selection is aligned and vendor coordination is simplified, teams can handle fluctuations without scrambling or adding headcount.
In home equity, execution isn’t about doing more. It’s about making smarter choices upfront so each file moves more predictably from intake to funding.

How Do Technology and Workflow Choices Shape Outcomes?

Once product strategy and vendor structure are aligned, technology becomes the next lever to help remove the manual work that quietly erodes efficiency.

The most effective technology decisions support the same three goals:

Support Smarter Product Selection

When systems allow lenders to clearly apply product guidelines within their workflow, staff spend less time second-guessing which title or valuation product to order. Clean integration makes it easier to route the right file to the right solution.

Reduce Manual Re-Entry

Without integration, teams often:

  • Re-key borrower and property data into multiple systems
  • Send and track orders through email
  • Manually upload completed documents back into their LOS

Integrated ordering and document return reduce those extra steps. Data flows once, and status updates remain visible within the core system. That alone can reclaim meaningful staff capacity.

Improve Visibility Across the File

When valuation, title, and closing updates are connected to the same workflow, teams spend less time chasing vendors and more time advancing files. Fewer status checks and fewer parallel processes lead to steadier turn times.

Just as important is what good workflow design avoids. It shouldn’t introduce new portals, disconnected logins, or duplicate tracking systems. Technology should reduce operational friction, not add to it.

In home equity lending, small inefficiencies compound quickly because margins are tighter. Smart workflow and integration choices help lenders protect both time and costs, especially when volume fluctuates.

What Should Lenders Be Prioritizing Before Volume Ramps Up?

Preparing for higher home equity volume doesn’t require reinvention. It requires tightening the areas that most directly affect cost, turn time, and staff capacity.

Before activity increases, lenders may want to focus on a few practical priorities:

  • Revisit title and valuation product strategy.
    Are lower-risk loans consistently routed to lower-cost, faster options? Are higher-dollar or complex files clearly defined so teams aren’t defaulting to the most expensive solution out of caution?
  • Evaluate vendor structure.
    How many providers are involved in valuation, title, and closing? Are internal teams spending time coordinating across vendors that could be consolidated?
  • Assess margin sensitivity.
    Because many home equity costs are lender-paid, small inefficiencies add up quickly. Where are unnecessary products, re-orders, or delays quietly eroding profitability?
  • Review integration and data flow.
    Are staff re-entering information outside the LOS? Are status updates easy to track, or dependent on email and manual follow-ups?
  • Test operational resilience.
    If volume increases by 10–20%, what strains first: underwriting capacity, vendor turn times, internal review, or closing coordination?

The objective isn’t to overhaul everything at once. It’s to make sure product selection is disciplined, vendor coordination is streamlined, and workflows are integrated enough to handle uneven demand without adding headcount or compressing margins.

When those elements are aligned, lenders are better positioned to respond smoothly when borrowers are ready to move.

FAQ: Common Home Equity Questions Lenders Are Asking

What is driving home equity demand in 2026?

Demand continues to be fueled by record homeowner equity and borrowers’ reluctance to disturb low first-mortgage rates. For many households, second liens offer a flexible way to access cash without refinancing their primary loan.

Yes. HELOCs continue to lead because they offer flexibility and interest-only options, especially in an environment where borrowers value optionality. Fixed-rate home equity loans still play a role for borrowers who want certainty around payments or a one-time lump sum.

Strong credit and low CLTVs don’t eliminate operational friction. Manual steps, fragmented vendor coordination, and inconsistent workflows often drive delays more than borrower risk.

The risks are often similar, even if the charters differ. Lean teams, limited tolerance for rework, and high expectations for borrower experience mean operational missteps show up quickly for both.

Bottlenecks usually come from handoffs, not underwriting. Re-keying data, managing multiple vendors, and unclear ownership of the file tend to slow things down more than credit decisions.

The most reliable lever is efficiency. Shorter cycle times, fewer manual steps, and clearer workflows allow teams to handle more files with the same resources.

Pricing gets borrowers in the door, but process determines whether the loan actually closes smoothly. In home equity, borrowers are quick to notice delays, confusion, or last-minute surprises.

Vendor coordination works best when it’s simplified. Fewer vendors, clearer accountability, and consistent processes across products and geographies reduce friction and improve predictability as volume grows.

Ashley is the CEO of CSS and oversees all aspects of the company’s strategy and operations.

Check out our latest articles