Appraiser fills out survey about the redesigned URAR

UAD 3.6 Readiness: Survey of 900 Appraisers

UAD 3.6 Readiness: What 900 Appraisers Are Saying About Adoption

UAD 3.6 officially entered Broad Production on January 26, 2026, and the industry is now preparing for the November 2, 2026, mandate. As lenders, appraisers, and technology providers begin working through the transition to the redesigned Uniform Residential Appraisal Report (URAR), questions around readiness, workflow impact, and market capacity are becoming more important.
To better understand how the transition may play out in practice, we surveyed 900 appraisers in our network about UAD 3.6 readiness, expected workflow impacts, and what they’re seeing on the ground.
Below are several key insights from that survey and what they may mean for lenders preparing for the transition.


 

What 900 Appraisers Are Saying About UAD 3.6

As the GSEs move deeper into the UAD 3.6 and redesigned URAR rollout, lenders are entering a mixed-format reality. Legacy appraisal forms will remain in play while UAD 3.6 adoption ramps up.

The Broad Production period began January 26, 2026, and the industry mandate is scheduled for November 2, 2026. During this transition period, many lenders will likely be managing parallel workflows as both formats remain active.

To help lenders plan with real-world input rather than assumptions, Corporate Settlement Solutions surveyed 900 appraisers in our network about UAD 3.6 readiness and expected operational impacts.

1. Expect a Dual-Track Environment: Legacy Forms Aren’t Going Away Overnight

When asked whether they will continue performing appraisals on legacy forms (non-UAD 3.6), 97% of appraisers said yes.

What this means for lenders

Even as lenders operationalize UAD 3.6, it will be important to plan for parallel intake and review workflows during the transition period. Many lenders expect to keep 2.6 formats in place for home equity or portfolio loans, and the survey suggests appraisers are prepared to continue supporting those formats.

2. Most Appraisers Plan to Support UAD 3.6, But Some Are Still Evaluating

  • 84% say they currently complete or plan to complete UAD 3.6–compliant reports
  • 12% are still evaluating or need more information
  • 4% said they will not complete UAD 3.6 reports

What this means for lenders

Overall capacity to support UAD 3.6 reports should be available, but adoption may not be evenly distributed across markets. Rural areas with smaller appraiser pools may experience greater variability.

3. Readiness Is Real, But Uneven

Among respondents describing their current level of preparation:

  • 30%: Ready to go (software and workflows in place)
  • 39%: In progress (coordinating with software vendors and reviewing guidance)
  • 24%: Getting started
  • 7%: Not started yet

What this means for lenders

Early rollout experiences may vary by geography and panel composition. Understanding which appraisers are currently prepared to support UAD 3.6 reporting may become an important part of panel management in 2026.

4. Fees: Many Anticipate Increases, But Evaluation Is Ongoing

On expected fee impact from UAD 3.6:

  • 52% anticipate a fee increase
    • 16% expect +$25–$100
    • 24% expect +$100–$200
    • 12% expect greater than $200
  • 43% say they are still evaluating
  • 5% expect no change

What this means for lenders

Budget planning and borrower-facing pricing may require some flexibility in 2026 and into 2027 as appraisers gain experience with the new reporting format and adjust their pricing accordingly.

5. Turn Times: Many Expect Slightly Longer Timelines

When asked about turnaround time changes for UAD 3.6–compliant appraisals:

  • 63% expect longer turnaround times
    • 26% expect +1 day
    • 23% expect +2 days
    • 15% expect more than 2 days
  • 34% expect no change
  • 3% expect reduced turnaround time

What this means for lenders

Even modest extensions in average appraisal timelines can create downstream pressure across rate locks, closing calendars, pipeline predictability, and borrower communications—especially for operations that rely on tight appraisal SLAs.

Additional Themes Appraisers Shared

Beyond the multiple-choice responses, appraisers shared candid perspectives about what’s driving uncertainty around UAD 3.6. Several themes stood out.

Software readiness remains a key factor

Many appraisers described readiness as less about willingness and more about whether their software tools are fully production-ready. Several leading appraisal platforms have not yet received GSE approval for UAD 3.6, preventing some appraisers from testing the format in real workflows.

A learning curve is expected

Many respondents expect some early volatility around turn times and fees as appraisers adapt to the redesigned reporting structure and new workflows.

Many appraisers say it’s still too early to commit

A consistent theme was hesitation to lock in firm expectations around pricing or timelines until appraisers have completed multiple real assignments under UAD 3.6.

More structure brings both clarity and concern

Some appraisers noted that the redesigned format introduces more structure and detail, which could improve reporting clarity but may also increase the effort required to complete each assignment.

What Lenders Can Do Now

While the full operational impact of UAD 3.6 will become clearer over time, there are several practical steps lenders can take today to prepare.

  • Plan explicitly for mixed-format workflows during the transition period
  • Revisit SLA assumptions for appraisal turn times, especially if downstream timelines are tight
  • Pressure-test valuation budgets with scenarios that include temporary fee increases or market-by-market variability
  • Segment appraisal panels by readiness (ready / in progress / getting started) and route early UAD 3.6 volume accordingly
  • Strengthen borrower communication so expectations are clear if appraisals become a pacing factor in certain markets

Preparing for the Transition

Industry transitions like UAD 3.6 rarely happen all at once. Instead, they tend to unfold gradually as technology providers, appraisers, and lenders adjust their workflows.

For many institutions, the coming year will likely involve managing a period where legacy appraisal formats and UAD 3.6 reports coexist. Understanding appraiser readiness, market capacity, and potential impacts on fees and turn times can help lending teams plan more effectively.

If you’d like to benchmark panel readiness, stress-test operational assumptions, or explore how UAD 3.6 may affect your valuation strategy, the CSS team is always glad to share what we’re seeing across the market.

Ashley is the CEO of CSS and oversees all aspects of the company’s strategy and operations.